The Despicable Cretin Nick Lowles
On August 3rd, this evil bastard that hates white British people, put out a false tweet that caused the Muslim Defence League and other Leftards to hit the streets of the UK baying for the blood of the 'far right' and the non existent EDL.
A lot of serious injuries were inflicted during attacks on many innocent people.
Lowles 'apologised' however, he then posted another false tweet, claiming that the 'far right' were organising countrywide protests for 7th August, with a list of times and places
Many 'counter protests' took place against these non existent protests. Evil Leftard scum all joined together to protest the non existent far right and the non existent EDL.
Once it was confirmed that the list had been a hoax, Lowles gloated about the MSM headlines that the hoax created. He is nothing but a hate monger against decent British people who hold patriotic values.
One of the 'counter protests' held was attended by Labour councillor, Ricky Jones. During this protest, Jones, referring to people like myself, that are concerned for our children and our future, stated ...
"They are disgusting nazi fascists and we need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all."
Followed by a throat slitting gesture.
Us decent people owe Lowles a massive thank you, for spreading this particular misinformation.
The misinformation resulted in Ricky Jones being exposed as an evil, out of control tyrant. He has since been languishing in Wormwood Scrubs awaiting trial.
Cheers, Lowles!
(Update - Released on bail 23rd October).
​
4th SEPT, I reported Lowles to MET Police.
5th SEPT, my local force GMP called me.
The call was an absolute joke (vocab starts at 13 mins).
The officer I spoke to didn't speak clear English and the line was low, so although I just about managed to understand what she was saying on the call, I struggled to transcribe parts of the recording, hence the dots (......) in parts.
What he said has been viewed by police already, and I am sure they have investigated and he apologised for that.
MW So, are you saying that he has already been investigated by police for spreading misinformation?
Yeah! If I'm aware, that it was Cleveland Police. They confirmed that it wasn't, that he hadn't actually reported it to police, if I'm right reading it.
MW Who hasn't reported it to police?
That he mentioned it, that something happened, but he didn't actually accuse anyone inparticular.
MW You've kind of lost me there?
All I can read is that he later apologised for the error and he later .... and the Cleveland police ..... recorded.
MW So it was reported to Cleveland police and they investigated it?
I believe so, but I don't have, like that information. I can only read you know.
From the information online ......
If you would like to complain about that, if you contact Cleveland and speak to them about it, maybe they will be able to advise you further.
MW So at the moment you believe that he was, it has, been investigated by Cleveland Police?
I don't believe it's been investigated. What I'm reading from online report, it says that they had no such incident recorded that accusing, you know, that the acid's been thrown on the woman.
MW I understand that - That there was no report of acid being thrown on a lady, that was completely false and Cleveland police did confirm that. That was false, that's true.
But he hasn't been investigated for spreading this misinformation?
....... Cleveland police made aware of this ...... ask them to investigate it.
MW I'll contact Cleveland police.
I mean, I contacted MET police because the suspect Nick lowles is in the MET area. The suspect's area force normally investigate.
Yeah yeah that's quite correct you know.
If that incident happened on the MET, the MET would be investigating even if the victim ...... (I haven't transcribed this part of the conversation as it's irrelevant, the officer was attempting to manipulate the true purpose of my crime report).
MW He hasn't been investigated for spreading this misinformation, that's the point I'm making.
I don't understand why, if I reported it to the MET?
Yes, GMP is my own area force, but you've just confirmed that it is normally the suspect's force that investigate?
I will contact Cleveland police, but although they investigated to find out and confirmed that an incident (acid) hadn't happened, I can't imagine that they would be the force that investigates Nick Lowles, because he isn't in their area.
I'll contact Cleveland police, but I'm absolutely certain that they won't have investigated him.
No but they might be able to give you more information about ......
Each force, they've got their own process .......
MW Basically at the moment GMP are saying to me - I've made a crime report and you're not accepting it as a crime report. You're not going to investigate it?
Yes, because we don't have a victim ..... you can't report .....
MW No, no, no. The lady that was arrested in Cheshire, for spreading misinformation, it was a third party that reported what she said.
Also, I've done other crime reports as a witness to things online. And that has actually led to 2 arrests and 2 charges.
Ricky Jones and Twista Cheese, due to my crime reports as a third party witnessing something online and reporting it to police.
They've taken the correct action in those circumstances, so I do know 100% that you can report a crime that you witness online, you don't have to be the victim of it.
And like I say, it's quite clear that the lady in Cheshire, somebody else reported her.
I think you're not correct with that.
If you can tell me what bit I've got wrong, in what I've just explained to you there?
Mmm, because you're not the victim. If we, if we would have the victim who finds it offensive then we could record a crime ...... a third party you know like a doctor or anyone, or reports on someone's behalf. ........ said something? Are you saying that's the crime?
MW Yeah, the crime is spreading misinformation, and misinformation that's quite serious, that has led to affect people.
Spreading misinformation is a crime
On this occasion ...... where he lives.
MW Which is the MET police
Which is why I reported it to the MET police.
You need to go back to them.
........ GMP ...... he's not here, he won't be investigated up here.
MW Exactly, that's why I reported it to the MET. And they sent it to you!
Basically, I don't think any of you want to deal with it so it will be just passed around. But are you still saying that I can't report crime as a witness online, when I already have on two occasions and those 2 people have been arrested and charged?
You can report any crimes or any incidents. You can report anything really ... each different circumstance ... depends what kind of incident it is.
..... different kind of incidents, but on this occasion ...
MW Yeah, but you kind of generalised, and said that I couldn't report it as a third party witness, when that is not true.
If you look at the crime and say its not a crime because whatever reason, but you actually just said that I couldn't report it as a third party.
No, you can report but im just saying that we don't always record third party reports. You can report anything you want to report ... don't record crime on everything that's been reported by third party.
MW So it's not, that it's not being recorded as a crime, because I'm a third party witness?
At this moment, it's not record crime as he's not living on GMP.
MW Right, so now the reason is, that it's not GMP, which I told you at the beginning.
Can you send the crime report back to the MET, or do I need to make another crime report, and put a note on there saying "please note, do not send this to GMP because the suspect lives in the met area".
I could possibly do that, ask my supervisor if I can send it back to MET, and ask them if they can make contact with yourself.
This will be closed and sent to MET ......
MW So I'll presume now, that it is being sent back to the MET, I'll wait to hear from the MET?
Yes and if that's not the case, then I'll call you straight back and explain what happened.
6th SEPT
The MET rejected the returned crime report as suspect home address not known!
10th SEPT
MET returned the report to GMP for initial investigation and suspect home address to be located and added to the report.
​
11th SEPT
I called the MET having not heard anything since the GMP call of the 5th Sept, and was advised of the above.
"As soon as that address is confirmed, we'll take it on ... There's no question we'll take it on.
12th SEPT Contacted GMP, who said, crime number has been generated and report passed to local team.
18th SEPT Call number 3 to GMP - Not yet allocated to an officer.
2nd OCT Call number 4 to GMP - Still not allocated to an officer.
22nd OCT Call number 5 to GMP - Allocated to an officer at last and an email being sent to them expressing my frustration that this one simple task has not yet been completed.
PC Wilson 06622.
​
28th OCT Wilson not on duty. No update on report. Back on duty, early shift Thurs 31st. Note sent to her again - I advised the 101 agent that I would be attending GMP Central Park in person if no joy on Thursday.
​
31st OCT First call, Wilson's line busy so not able to connect "call back in 15 mins".
Called back, not able to 'connect me with her'. This agent sent a message to her while I was still on the call.
I was establishing Wilson's shifts going forward and ready to call back every day, as well as attending Central Park) when the operator said Wilson had agreed to speak to me, and we connected.
Here you need to listen to the recording and draw your own conclusions.
NB. I double checked following this call and I had no missed calls or emails. Basically, she lied re an attempt to contact me.
There is a small gap in this recording (10 secs). The initial recording stopped while I was recording on another device. You hear me flip flopping back to the device to restart it!
FRIDAY 1st NOVEMBER UPDATE
For anyone that hasn't listened to the above recording of Thursday 31st October - Basically, PC Christina Wilson stated:
1. GMP have had no instruction from MET.
I have audio recording of MET stating that they are waiting on GMP to establish Lowles home address and return the report to them.
2. She has previously tried to contact me.
I have had no missed calls, texts or emails from GMP.
3. She was completely negative regarding establishing his home address, and I tell her what I think about her being negative, to which she gets defensive and stroppy, but then feigns interest.
​
4. She couldn't grasp the Cleveland Police force involvement, and in my opinion, she was making out that I was causing a fuss with 3 police forces, which is obviously not true.
5. She also had to check Cleveland spelling with me, and asked if it's in the UK, as she could only find Cleveland, USA "on the map"! I advised her to Google Cleveland Police Force!
​
​
There was a follow up phone call (to be uploaded) where she asks me to contact the MET to get the name of the officer in charge there. Which I dutifully did and supplied to her, along with all the other information that she requested on the first call.
​
Then the next morning I'm greeted with this LOAD OF BOLLOCKS!
Of course, I knew this was coming, but at least I'd pushed and pushed and forced their hand.
What we have here is absolute proof of
TWO TIER POLICING !!!
